{"snapshot":{"generatedAt":"2026-05-06T14:50:50.392Z","queue":{"pendingDiscovery":0,"pendingGeneration":0,"runningGeneration":1,"failedGeneration":213,"completedGeneration":39},"catalog":{"publishedPlans":38,"publishedBlogPosts":4},"runningJobs":[{"id":"cmo8xemwn00026jw2f7u621ml","title":"Security & Compliance Exception Handling Agent for Security Teams","slug":"security-compliance-exception-handling-agent-for-security-teams","startedAt":"2026-04-21T18:04:05.603Z","phase":"source_collection","lastError":null,"pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1"}],"recentOutcomes":{"completed":[{"id":"cmn6m8qb0005x6j8enedgb4hd","title":"Invoice Exception Triage, Duplicate Payment Prevention & Supplier Statement Reconciliation Agent for Accounts Payable Teams","slug":"invoice-exception-triage-duplicate-payment-prevention-supplier-statement-reconci","completedAt":"2026-03-25T22:33:46.066Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Recovered market research after extraction failure: max_output_tokens","planStatus":"PUBLISHED"},{"id":"cmn6m32js002x6j8eqvxfi7a1","title":"Dependent Eligibility Verification, Life Event Document Chase & Premium Leakage Prevention Agent for Benefits Operations Teams","slug":"dependent-eligibility-life-event-document-chase-premium-leakage-agent-benefits-o","completedAt":"2026-03-25T22:28:41.221Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Recovered market research after extraction failure: max_output_tokens","planStatus":"PUBLISHED"},{"id":"cmn6lvsbb02hu6j1s7dfpnoks","title":"Enterprise Support SLA Breach, Escalation Handoff & Service Credit Prevention Agent for Support Operations Teams","slug":"enterprise-support-sla-breach-escalation-handoff-service-credit-prevention-agent","completedAt":"2026-03-25T22:24:17.042Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Recovered market research after extraction failure: max_output_tokens","planStatus":"PUBLISHED"},{"id":"cmn6lqjtk02do6j1s99v9kg18","title":"SaaS Auto-Renewal Notice, Shelfware Exposure & Termination Window Agent for IT Procurement Teams","slug":"saas-auto-renewal-notice-shelfware-termination-window-agent-it-procurement","completedAt":"2026-03-25T22:18:36.659Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Recovered landscape from partial output after: max_output_tokens","planStatus":"PUBLISHED"},{"id":"cmn6likke02as6j1sp8hjroel","title":"RFP Intake, Answer Library Drift & SME Deadline Orchestration Agent for Proposal Teams","slug":"rfp-intake-answer-library-drift-sme-deadline-orchestration-agent-proposal-teams","completedAt":"2026-03-25T22:14:31.843Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Recovered market research after extraction failure: max_output_tokens","planStatus":"PUBLISHED"},{"id":"cmn6l5b5n02576j1srl9do7a8","title":"Creative Rights Expiration, Talent Usage Restrictions & Takedown Evidence Agent for Advertising Operations Teams","slug":"creative-rights-expiration-talent-usage-restrictions-takedown-evidence-agent-adv","completedAt":"2026-03-25T22:02:49.273Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Recovered market research after extraction failure: max_output_tokens","planStatus":"PUBLISHED"},{"id":"cmn6kynqy02266j1sz1pq84ia","title":"Annual Report Filing, Foreign Qualification Drift & Good Standing Evidence Agent for Corporate Legal Teams","slug":"annual-report-filing-foreign-qualification-good-standing-agent-corporate-legal","completedAt":"2026-03-25T21:57:03.009Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Recovered market research after extraction failure: max_output_tokens","planStatus":"PUBLISHED"},{"id":"cmn6kqbr401z56j1sb6c85oc3","title":"Open-Source License Obligations, SBOM Drift & Release Notice Evidence Agent for Platform Engineering Teams","slug":"open-source-license-obligations-sbom-drift-release-notice-evidence-agent-platfor","completedAt":"2026-03-25T21:50:46.652Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Retrying landscape research after: max_output_tokens","planStatus":"PUBLISHED"}],"failed":[{"id":"cmo83m0ha02gx6jti1sr6zt02","title":"Procurement Exception Handling Agent for Procurement Teams","slug":"procurement-exception-handling-agent-for-procurement-teams","completedAt":"2026-04-21T04:17:10.336Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Validation rejected publish: The public preview's Expected 12-month revenue section is internally contradictory and does not match the actual revenue model: it shows $396k / $364k / $460k with broken arithmetic, while the repaired model is $40k / $92k / $156k.; The preview revenue math implicitly counts near-full ARR from all wins and overstates first-year recognized revenue for a pilot-led product that requires workflow mapping, stakeholder alignment, and integrations.; The pricing narrative is not fully coherent: the plan describes hybrid seat-based, usage-based, and overage pricing plus premium support, while the actual forecast assumes a single initial package of $18k ARR plus $4k implementation.; Evidence is mostly vendor-authored and does not directly validate the stated pilot-to-paid conversion, implementation fee acceptance, or customer willingness to pay the assumed subscription price.","planStatus":"FAILED"},{"id":"cmo6o5jli01vp6jtij9s3g8ar","title":"Industrial Operations Exception Handling Agent for Plant Operations Teams","slug":"industrial-operations-exception-handling-agent-for-plant-operations-teams","completedAt":"2026-04-20T04:18:41.191Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Validation rejected publish: The public preview revenue math is incorrect: 3 × ($100,000 subscription + $25,000 implementation) equals $375,000, not $550,000.; The public preview revenue section conflicts with the structured revenue model; the draft shows a $775,000 base case in one place and $390,000 displayed expected 12-month revenue in another.; The public preview high case duplicates the base case, which makes the forecast appear unreviewed and unreliable.; Evidence does not directly support SAP-specific workflow demand, enterprise budget ownership, or $100,000+ per-site willingness to pay.; Claims of validation against SAP workflow standards and compliance-ready controls are broader than the cited sources support.","planStatus":"FAILED"},{"id":"cmnwo2cc2015n6jtix2bcwizq","title":"Cash Application Exception, Remittance Retrieval & Deduction Routing Agent for Accounts Receivable Teams","slug":"cash-application-exception-remittance-retrieval-deduction-routing-agent-ar-teams","completedAt":"2026-04-13T04:21:37.297Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Validation rejected publish: The public preview revenue section conflicts with the revised revenue-model JSON and contains arithmetic errors in all three scenarios (for example, 9 × $60,000 + 9 × $15,000 does not equal $495,000).; The preview still references older acquisition assumptions and unsupported upsell language that are not reconciled with the revised conservative 3/5/8-customer model.; Evidence supports the operational pain, but there is no direct validation of buyer willingness to pay, implementation effort by source type, or realistic enterprise conversion rates; those assumptions need light customer or pilot evidence before publication.","planStatus":"FAILED"},{"id":"cmnv8nfpe00it6jtince2mfqf","title":"Revenue Operations Exception Handling Agent for Revenue Operations Teams","slug":"revenue-operations-exception-handling-agent-for-revenue-operations-teams","completedAt":"2026-04-12T04:17:35.892Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Validation rejected publish: Public preview revenue math is wrong and conflicts with the corrected JSON revenue model, making the plan internally inconsistent.; Claims that pricing is benchmarked and conversion assumptions are realistic are not supported by the cited sources; the evidence does not validate ACV, attach rate, or trial-to-paid behavior.; The plan broadens from Salesforce-centric evidence to cross-system RevOps, billing, ERP, and payment exception handling without direct supporting evidence.","planStatus":"FAILED"},{"id":"cmnqybxpc00076jticgmz9iv8","title":"Feature Flag Expiration, Stale Experiment Cleanup & Kill-Switch Readiness Agent for Developer Platform Teams","slug":"feature-flag-expiration-stale-experiment-cleanup-kill-switch-readiness-agent-dev","completedAt":"2026-04-09T04:16:54.738Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Validation rejected publish: Public-facing expected 12-month revenue figures conflict with the explicit revenue model, including a duplicated base/high case in the preview ($288k / $432k / $432k vs. $90k / $192k / $360k).; The evidence supports stale-flag detection and some cleanup automation, but does not substantiate the broader claims around incident-aware kill-switch readiness, owner chasing, and rollback verification as differentiated paid features.; All cited sources are vendor documentation, so phrases like 'vendor-validated solution' overstate the strength of proof; there is no independent buyer, ROI, or pricing validation.; The preview's acquisition assumptions (8 new organizations per month with 20% pilot-to-paid conversion) do not fit the integration-heavy, solutions-assisted enterprise motion described elsewhere in the plan.; Draft artifact prices ($99-$399) are irrationally cheap for a trusted one-time plan artifact and detached from the stated year-one value and likely rebuild cost.","planStatus":"FAILED"},{"id":"cmno3gjzu01r86je83u53kxvh","title":"Cloud Commitment Utilization, Idle Resource Reclamation & Renewal Leverage Agent for FinOps Teams","slug":"cloud-commitment-utilization-idle-resource-reclamation-renewal-leverage-agent-fi","completedAt":"2026-04-07T04:53:40.453Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Validation rejected publish: The public preview revenue section conflicts with the revised revenue model and contains arithmetic/scenario errors (for example, the listed base-case formula sums to $630,000, not $585,000, and the preview does not match the revised $72k/$174k/$323k model).; Claims about 'industry benchmarks,' 'comparable offering pricing,' and a 25% sales conversion rate are not supported by the cited evidence.; Evidence is too thin to justify confidence in a $30,000 ACV plus separate onboarding and renewal-pack fees; there is no customer interview, pilot, procurement, or outcome evidence showing buyers will pay for this workflow.; The claimed differentiation around 'vendor-ready renewal leverage' is plausible but not evidenced; the current sources do not show that evidence packs materially improve renewal outcomes versus native AWS tooling or existing FinOps platforms.","planStatus":"FAILED"},{"id":"cmnmo0p7l01b66je84dahizpn","title":"Timecard Exception Resolution, Meal-Break Compliance & Retro-Pay Prevention Agent for HR Operations Teams","slug":"timecard-exception-meal-break-compliance-retro-pay-prevention-agent-hr-operation","completedAt":"2026-04-06T04:22:18.977Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Validation rejected publish: The public preview revenue projections (12 accounts; $180k/$288k/$384k) conflict with the revised revenue model (3/5/8 accounts; $69k/$150k/$304k), making the plan internally inconsistent.; The title and copy overclaim on 'meal-break compliance' and 'retro-pay prevention'; the evidence supports exception-resolution workflow improvement, not proven legal compliance or prevention outcomes.; Evidence quality is vendor-heavy and does not substantiate 'validated pricing,' strong willingness to pay, or a reliable year-one sales ramp.; A key product dependency is two-way integration and correction write-back into UKG Ready or similar systems, but that implementation depth is not validated by the cited sources.","planStatus":"FAILED"},{"id":"cmnhvu41300076jfehe2d0f0s","title":"Security Questionnaire Intake, Trust Evidence Reuse & Deal-Blocker Escalation Agent for GRC Teams","slug":"security-questionnaire-intake-trust-evidence-reuse-deal-blocker-escalation-agent","completedAt":"2026-04-02T21:29:20.611Z","pipelineVersion":"2026-03-24-plan-salvage-v1","lastError":"Validation rejected publish: The public preview's expected 12-month revenue figures ($350k / $504k / $504k) materially conflict with the canonical revenue model ($132k / $260k / $420k), so the plan is not internally coherent.; The public preview high case is not higher than the base case, leaving the published scenario range arithmetically broken.; The evidence base is too thin for the specific ACV, pilot-to-paid conversion, and first-year customer-count assumptions: there are no primary customer interviews, customer proof points, or direct price benchmarks cited.","planStatus":"FAILED"}]}},"reports":[{"id":"cmn5c4h800000u9u0h59q7pnh","slug":"revenue-validation-and-value-based-pricing-upgrade","title":"Revenue Validation and Value-Based Pricing Upgrade","sourcePath":"/home/ai/Development/aibusinessideas/docs/pipeline-reports/revenue-validation-and-value-pricing.md","summary":["Added a dedicated model-based revenue validation step before publish.","Revenue models are now validated separately from the broader plan validation so weak or inflated numbers can block publication directly.","Offer pricing is now derived from validated expected revenue and confidence instead of a de facto static floor.","Existing published plans were backfilled with explicit expected 12-month revenue models and preview updates."],"whatWasBrokenBefore":["Revenue numbers could exist without a dedicated plausibility gate.","Offer pricing could stay disconnected from the upside of the idea.","A low-opportunity plan and a high-opportunity plan could drift toward similar price points.","Pipeline-change work produced useful operational lessons, but those lessons were not being published as customer-facing products."],"whatChangedTechnically":["Added a revenue validation stage that can revise or reject the draft revenue model.","Added value-based offer repricing derived from validated expected revenue and confidence level.","Added a reusable pipeline-report publisher so successful pipeline changes can become sellable catalog artifacts."],"successfulRunEvidence":["https://revenuesleuth.com/api/plans","https://revenuesleuth.com/plans/chargeback-representment-friendly-fraud-recovery-agent-ecommerce-merchants","https://revenuesleuth.com/plans/sales-commission-overpayment-plan-qa-agent-revops-teams","https://revenuesleuth.com/plans/product-feed-disapproval-merchant-account-reinstatement-agent-ecommerce-advertis"],"observedCommercialOutcomes":["Chargeback plan expected revenue was backfilled to $224,100.","Sales commission plan expected revenue was backfilled to $1,040,000.","Product feed recovery plan expected revenue was backfilled to $66,000.","Those revenue models now appear in the public preview and API output."],"whyBuyersShouldCare":["Buyers can now compare plan price against expected upside more rationally.","Weak plans should be filtered earlier when the revenue model does not hold up.","Strong plans can justify a higher artifact price without drifting into absurd consulting pricing."],"openRisks":["The revenue validator still relies on model judgment rather than external numeric verification.","Pricing policy should continue to be tuned against actual conversion behavior."],"createdAt":"2026-03-25T00:58:19.056Z","updatedAt":"2026-03-25T00:58:19.056Z"}]}